Blog
Life

What's YouTube Premium and is it any good?

15 comments

When it comes to viewership, YouTube still rules the roost in the streaming world, far ahead of Netflix or Spotify–and still free. I had a strange feeling when advertising segments were starting to pile up in their videos last year. Who wants to view a four-minute video when they first have to go through two minutes of ads? Was this a deliberate attempt to annoy their users? Unless you were using ad blockers, you were literally flooded–and it felt like an obvious attempt to drive users towards a paid offer.

The number one in streaming–and advertising apparently

Shortly after, ads for YouTube premium started to pop up in all possible (and impossible) places. Even if you rejected the offer again and again, the ads kept coming. So I recently started a free three month trial. I wanted to escape the ads, keep my sanity, and tell you more about the service! Let's find out what YouTube Premium, which usually costs $11.99 a month (more than Disney+ or the cheapest Netflix subscription), can do. For starters, aside from the unobtrusive "Premium" lettering next to the YouTube logo, there's little indication that I'm now a valued member. No fanfare, no welcome screen of any kind. That can't be all, right?

As far as ads go, YouTube is now free of ads for me–as long as we're talking about ads injected by the service. As soon as I open a video about cars from the 70s, I hear the all to familiar "Before we begin, a word from our sponsor: South VPN*." That's as far as the "ad-free" in YouTube Premium goes. Likewise, the legion of influencers won't suddenly drop their makeup kits or nutritional supplements and switch to more serious content. So no more YouTube-sponsored ads. Yay, I guess! As a little bonus, I can now save videos locally and watch them offline. Commuters who watch a lot of YouTube on the bus or train will probably like this–but you can already achieve the same through multiple apps and internet sites. So, while slightly more convenient, this feature is only a small plus.

Cellphone or tablet users of the YouTube app can now keep watching or listening while their devices are locked or they are using another app. Another great feature to get your pulse racing with excitement, right? Not mine, for sure. Then there's YouTube Music Premium. This service is so similar to YouTube, I had to get my reading glasses to spot the differences. It's basically a kind of Spotify clone that plays the audio tracks from YouTube (music) videos. To be honest, I was expecting more from the multi-billion dollar market leader! Yes, you can use it to save bandwidth and stream audio only, you can even create random playlists or switch between audio or video mode, and the design looks nice and feels professional. It is potentially almost enough to replace your Spotify, Deezer or Apple Music subscription but still not quite there in terms of quality!

YouTube Music Premium is included at no extra charge

I'm beginning to get the feeling that, aside from the "ad-free" experience, YouTube Premium doesn't offer anything new. And that's too little, both in terms of features and motivation. It's like handing over your candy to the obnoxious fat kid in school to stop them from harassing you. If YouTube Premium opened up a new world of exclusive videos, live content and series, things would feel different. But why pay $11.99 to restore YouTube to its original state from years ago? By the way, $11.99 won't cover your whole family. If you want that, you'll have to cough up $17.99. I keep going through the service details to find the features I must have missed so far because I can't believe I'm expected to spend $143.88 a year for its current state.

Even being the streaming fan that I am, my conclusion is rather sobering: I don't dislike subscription models. I'm perfectly willing to pay for good content on a monthly basis, but this is not how you do it! There's no wow moment, no feeling of satisfaction when I open up YouTube. If you're already using an ad blocker, you'll hardly notice the difference–or the value added. YouTube Music Premium is nice, and already knows your musical preferences, but that's all it is. No excitement there, just some mild relief that you get to escape YouTube's own ads for a while. If all this was coming from a small startup, I'd still be unimpressed, but we're talking Google here so the bar is just so much higher. If YouTube Premium is good enough for you, feel free to subscribe. I'll very likely cancel my subscription after the trial period!

What I would like to know: Would you consider paying for YouTube (Premium)? Does your usage of YouTube differ significantly from mine?

*sponsor name greatly altered

15 comments
  • R

    I love watching videos on Youtube. I won't be paying the premium price. I won't even do the 30-day-trial. A penny pincher, huh? I do love the Documentaries n Instructional Vids.

    Well, I do pay for Amazon Prime which has a huge amount of bells and whistles. Prime low prices, deals, and 2 day shipping. Movies and Tv shows, even some old Classic Movies and TV. Amazon Music, no adds, I don't pay for the premium, but I do get all I want to listen to, download, make playlists, etc, many devices. PC, smartphone, and Fire-TV stick. And free Games.

    Seems to me Youtube is like an old car with square wheels, they need to revamp it, rev it up some; if they want people to pay mucho denairi.

  • M

    I completely agree with what you said about YouTube! It's not worth the money! Maybe Ashampoo is thinking of producing an app, obviously not on a subscription basis, that can remove ads from YouTube! That would be great, wouldn't it? I trust Ashampoo!

  • p

    I was thinking about getting YouTube TV, where I can get CNN, and all the rest of my favorite channels. Then cancel cable. I would be saving about 50%.

    First I am going to call my cable provider (Spectrum/Charter) to see if they will come down on the price. If not I think I will change.

  • J

    Agree with you. Unlike Netflix etc. They don’t even provide the content so are charging just for hosting other’s content.

    I have also noticed some YouTubers, I follow, are backing in their sponsors ad into the their video. I assume because they don’t get revenue in premium?

  • A

    nop

  • J

    No, I won't pay for youtube. I have already stopped NetFlix. I do have Amazon Prime, but, that's just so I won't have to go out shopping and I don't even bother with their videos. I usually just read for entertainment.

  • D

    I concur with your sentiments and also believe almost all streaming services are overpriced. I am a fan of reasonably priced Acorn & Britbox. There are many facets of Google and its offerings to warrant great praise, but there are also many that deservedly elicit my considerable disdain. YouTube Premium holds no allure for me, and considering the price that you have indicated, it will not.

  • E

    Absolutely not worth the price!

  • B

    I'm probably jinxing myself, but I've been using Ad Block Plus and I have yet to see a single YouTube ad. (Other than those put in by the creators, of course.)

  • D

    Thanks for your report! Maybe, though, switching to YouTube Premium is worth it just to get rid of the YT Premium pop-up. (Nah, price still isn't right, not by a longshot.)

  • T

    My views are essentially the same as your though I haven't tried to free month. It does promote itself as being much than your saying or at least it make one assume such. Anyway thanks for the read and info I'll keep mine without a prem. :-)

  • M

    Ha, ha! I hadn't seriously considered paying for YouTube, and your review has made it clear that even the Free Trial is a waste of time. I paid for an app years ago to save YouTube and other videos, and with frequent updates it still works well today. I can ignore most ads, and very occasionally they are for items that interest me, and I just turn off any videos that stick annoying ads in the middle.

  • R

    Considering the misinformation (much of it dangerous) that ends up on YouTube, I would be loath to pay them anything. My ad blocker (AdGuard) completely blocks YouTube advertising. I realize that ad blockers are not popular with web site owners but that's the price paid for obnoxious advertising. I still remember how in the early days of cable TV in the United States we were promised ad-free viewing. Now we pay to watch commercials; lots and lots and lots of commercials. At least we still have the mute button.

  • A

    I prefer to download content and then, offline, fast forward through all the awful commercials, just like I do when watching my cable tv.

  • S

    Absolutely not. The only YouTube I ever view is something someone sent in a link and only if I can view without disruption. 99.99999% of my life is lived without YT. I despise MBA's because they spend all their working hours deciding how to monetize anything and everything in their zeal to increase ROI, next quarter's results, bottom line, pennies per share, etc.

About Ashampoo
Users
22+ million
Downloads
500.000+ per month
World-wide
In over 160 countries
Experience
Over 25 years
Ashampoo icon