Blog
Tech

ChatGPT - Chances and risks

"Welcome to my blog about ChatGPT - a cutting-edge language model developed by OpenAI! As an AI language model, ChatGPT has been designed to communicate with humans in natural language and provide informative responses to a wide range of queries. With its advanced capabilities in natural language processing and machine learning, ChatGPT has become one of the most sophisticated and powerful language models available today. In this blog, we will explore the features and functionality of ChatGPT, and delve into the ways in which it can be used to enhance communication and improve knowledge sharing. So if you're curious about ChatGPT and want to learn more about how it can help you achieve your goals, be sure to read on!"

ChatGPT: Blessing or curse?

The introduction you just read wasn't written by me, or any other human being for that matter. I simply set up a free account and entered "write introduction for a blog about ChatGPT" into a textbox at https://openai.com/. It took the software just seconds to generate the above paragraph, which is not only grammatically correct but also serves its purpose as an intro. The chatbot from American research lab OpenAI is currently enthralling the masses and stirring up futuristic fantasies and skepticism alike. The aim is to create sophisticated neural networks that somewhat resemble the human nervous system. And, so far, the AI (Artificial Intelligence) has absorbed 500 billion words and achieved comprehension of the syntax and semantics of various languages through a complicated procedure. The resulting chatbot is certainly good enough for a casual chat and also handles various tasks with (often) amazing results.

What is ChatGPT good for?

ChatGPT creates on-demand articles that appear human-made. When asked to write a brief article about the history of clay pigeon shooting, I got five neat paragraphs with facts and figures that looked like a Wikipedia entry. It's not Pulitzer Prize material, and long-established authors don't need to worry (yet), but it's certainly good enough for informational or instructional texts. ChatGPT can also double as a translator–with results just shy of top dog Deepl in this field. Presently, linguistic complexity still poses an issue for the technology but, given that the AI is constantly learning and evolving–not least based on the feedback of now over 100 million users–it's only a matter of time until it can go toe-to-toe with the best in the field. It's ability to auto-summarize articles is already a genuine timesaver. The system reliably identifies core passages and turns them into concise but information-dense articles. Intriguingly, even German bureaucratic jargon was correctly processed and then translated into comprehensible form–a bit of a masterstroke in my book! Naturally, ChatGPT also has the potential to improve the often annoying chatbots so prevalent on the internet today. Currently, dozens of corporate and government websites employ supposedly smart bots that do little more than turn index and keyword-based searches into pseudo-intelligent conversations– with all too often frustrating results. That may all be about to change. We are looking at another technological revolution in the realm of human-machine interaction–alas, also in the military sector, with a number of drones and robot armies having already been successfully commandeered by AI.

Bing meets ChatGPT

It's fair to say Bing still hasn't caught up with Google in the domain of online searching. And yet, ever since it became known that Microsoft will be gradually integrating ChatGPT into Bing, the number of users has increased noticeably. Most modern search engines only return a list of links for any given query, and don't generally answer questions directly, with a few exceptions. AI will change that too: Imagine planning a trip to celebrate your September anniversary and asking for suitable destinations within a 4-hour flight radius. Instead of coming up with dozens of links to nearby airlines and flight schedules, AI will identify the key points in your question (occasion, trip, month, flight time) and compile a genuine response that includes potential destinations, flight times, and links to additional details. This is impressive, and useful, stuff that is way beyond what Google can do today. It's the ability to instantly string together information from different sources into one cohesive article that makes the technology so appealing from a user's perspective. Naturally, ChatGPT put Google (and other search engine providers) on high alert for fear of losing out! OpenAI is not the only lab/company working on natural language processing, but ChatGPT practically raised the bar overnight–with some calling it Google's "Kodak crisis". After all, it was Kodak's blatant ignorance of new digital photo technology, and inability to adapt to changing market needs, that led to the company's downfall. History may be about to repeat itself with Google. The pressure is already so high that Google felt compelled to demo their ChatGPT alternative "Bard" ahead of time–which ultimately failed to wow audiences due to factual errors, causing even Google employees to call the demo "premature" and a "screw-up".

Simple frontend, complex backend Simple surface, much behind

What about click rates?

There's a growing problem on the horizon for sites that are heavily reliant on organic traffic i.e., actual user visits and clicks, to generate revenue. Imagine you've put together a site about how to drive away moles from your garden. Today, Google's search engine already extracts small passages from existing sites and displays them alongside their URLs. If these excerpts contain everything users are looking for, they'll likely not visit the site afterwards. ChatGPT's ability to sum up the gist of entire web pages makes this even worse! That means: no ad revenue, no user feedback, no external motivation to keep sites alive. It's this "parasitarian" behavior that has experts sound the alarm and warn against the looming desolation of the internet. At least for the time being, there's little incentive for Big Tech to voluntarily share profits with content creators, especially given that ChatGPT and other AI-driven solutions require billion dollar investments to be successful to boot. After all, the client-side reduction in complexity leads to an increase in complexity on the server side–analyzing, processing, and compiling information is compute-intensive and companies have yet to come up with proper refinancing strategies.

True artificial intelligence? Rather not Real intelligence? Hardly

ChatGPT risks

As impressive as the results are, depending on your definition, there's no genuine intelligence behind these systems. They analyze, quote, and calculate probabilities based on user input, but they don't possess real knowledge of the world around them. Still, studies show that humans tend to overestimate artificial intelligences due to their aura of objectivity, and sometimes seemingly super-human capabilities. There's a reason researchers prefer "statistical learning" to "artificial intelligence", because the former is what these systems ultimately engage in. Well, statistics can be biased and falsified and, consequently, so can AI responses. One may argue that this makes AI more human, but it's also a major vulnerability that can be exploited through propaganda and censorship, government-side or business-side. It could be just another tool in the master manipulator's toolbox! There's also criticism from educators worried that ChatGPT could make life too easy for students and cause their academic prowess to stagnate or atrophy. Teachers have been struggling with internet-based copy-and-paste articles passed off as homework for years, and ChatGPT can already produce passable essays today. We may be looking at an even greater dependence on technology down the road that will make our current (over)reliance on Google pale in comparison.

Conclusion

The AI revolution kicked off around 2012, when neural networks were created that could solve computer vision problems. Today, we're in the throes of the generative AI revolution that will once again affect and alter our very lives. Voice assistants will finally be able to engage in "natural" conversations and will help their users solve real problems more quickly. The possibilities are many–and so are the risks. The establishment of an AI-driven authority devoid of morals and conscience that becomes the central herald of, easily manipulable, truth cannot be in our best interest. In the light of all present, and future, amenities provided by ChatGPT, we must ensure autonomy in thought and opinion does not fall victim to it!

3 comments
  • B

    Thank you for presenting this article and for the overview. I've been using ChatGPT for a while now. While it seems to provide good summaries and suggestions for writing, I find that it is very "puritanical" in its willingness to participate in controversial areas. Because I am a teacher, I deal with the issues that young people face every day. Some are truly heartbreaking - everything from self-image issues to bullying, and so on. I wrote about a bullying scenario that one of my students told me she experienced and entered it in ChatGPT in the form of a dialogue amongst 3 students. I asked for suggestions on how an adult could help. In other words, I asked ChatGPT to generate some dialogue lines that a teacher might use in this scenario. The reason I asked for this is because there are times when we have our students learn about the dangers of bullying (and other controversial topics) via role play situations. ChatGPT pretty much refused to return an answer, except for saying something to the effect that "bullying is a very serious problem" and I "should be looking for ways to help, instead of writing plays about it." ChatGPT's (mis)interpretation of my request didn't help at all. I then changed around the dialogue, and because it had some foul language, (and these lines were direct quotes that my students told me they experienced in bully situations), and ChatGPT thought it was pornographic and said that it violated community standards. As an experienced teacher for many years, I will never depend on computer software to help me solve my dilemmas. I dealt with the situation, as I have done in the past, making sure all concerned received the proper follow-ups (including counseling, education, and disciplinary actions according to district policies).

    Whereas ChatGPT utilizes AI to generate responses, I don't think, and maybe I'm wrong about this, ChatGPT should take a moral stand on issues. I didn't ask ChatGPT for its opinion. I asked it for suggestions on how adults can better help the students involved in these types of situations.

    As far as Bing's Chat is concerned, I'm not really sure I can warm up to the way their version of AI returns suggestions. First of all, I was on the waiting list for a very long period of time. I was even gullible enough to believe that I could speed up the wait time by switching my browser's default settings from Google to Bing, Chrome to Edge, as well as some other defaults. (Nice try Microsoft!) So finally I was "allowed" into the Bing Chat experience, and I was less than pleased. Most of my requests in Bing Chat were limited to 10 or so lines. Furthermore, when it generated the responses, it didn't really look any different than any other search performed by Bing (or any search engine for that matter).

    All told, the one shining example of AI that works for me is Microsoft’s Azure text to speech audio generation. Nobody, and I mean no other TTS provider, even comes close. Not only are there a wide range of voices available, but the ability to tailor everything from intonation, to stress, to mispronunciations due to speaking disabilities is incredible. I have been using MS Azure TTS for quite some time now, and I am more than happy with its AI capabilities.

  • S

    I see potential for good with Chat Bots if they eliminate 'journalists' and their useless, overpaid professors. Maybe we can become a world of Reporters and Chat Bots. Reporters can be identified with Blue Checkmarks.

  • H

    At 81 years old I have seen tremendouis

    changes. Hopefully this will be approched with great caution, perhaps better than we have done in the past.

    Take Care

    Harvey

About Ashampoo
Users
22+ million
Downloads
500.000+ per month
World-wide
In over 160 countries
Experience
Over 25 years
Ashampoo icon